Harry Longshanks
ILikeBigPutts&ICannotLie
Here is the JL logo alone. It still feels trendy, fresh, clean, formal, innovative.
The more you add to it, the harder it is to maintain all of those feelings.
I think the benefit of a simple logo like JL's or Nike's swoosh is that you can add anything you want to it without diminishing the effectiveness of the logo itself. Throw it on argyle for one project, put it next to a catch phrase for a different project.
But the more detailed and complicated you make the "core" logo, the more you limit yourself in the future.
For example, while I like the argyle motif, are you going to put that on a golf ball, in color? Will it be big enough to be clear? What about a sleeve logo? What happens when argyle goes out of fashion? You don't want to change the logo ever, if you can avoid it.
My opinion --> the logo should be exceptionally simple, and should be recognizable in all black on an all white background. If you have that as your basis, you can create anything around it.
Burton snowboards (The "Process B"):
Nike (the swoosh):
Volcom (stone):