$20 is $20 people.....(at least that is the minim. Payment required at this point). Eat out one less day or skip the case of beer on the course (man, did I just say that?) but donating should be A part of what gets you looked at. Just saying.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
$20 is $20 people.....(at least that is the minim. Payment required at this point). Eat out one less day or skip the case of beer on the course (man, did I just say that?) but donating should be A part of what gets you looked at. Just saying.....
$20 is $20 people.....(at least that is the minim. Payment required at this point). Eat out one less day or skip the case of beer on the course (man, did I just say that?) but donating should be A part of what gets you looked at. Just saying.....
For real, "Up and Down" didn't get enough listeners? I find that hard to believe. Those were excellent and funny shows. I'd definitely like to see them come back. What constitutes enough listeners? Surely we've all listened to them....
Don't quit, your posts have kept me interested in the new cleveland stuff. Especially since you seem to be honest about good and bad days and the fitting session, that was you right? As for anyone discounting reviews because they are written by a woman, who would care what they thought anyway. Admittedly I'm not gonna be interested in womens equip. but all the other stuff is being reviewed by a valid reviewer.I guess I need to quit raving about all my new Cleveland equipment in the Cleveland threads since none of you want my opinion. I still love ya though.
20 bucks is a weeks gas money. I love THP, but there are certain things that take priority. I understand where you are coming from, but sometimes people are strapped for cash.
I have more of a suggestion than a complaint. I think that something needs to be done to improve the testing threads. Some of these threads get so much banter going on in them that it is really hard to follow what each tester has to say because you have to sort through 10+ pages of banter. My suggestion... could THP set up a thread which has two parts to it. One with a timeline of the testers thoughts on the equipment and a second with a comment section where you can banter and ask questions to the testers about the clubs. Kinda like the reviews on the homepage but with more interaction. I think overall this will allow readers get easy access to the testers thoughts. I'm not saying that I don't want the banter, I just think that this will make these threads easier to follow and enjoy by all. Just my 2 cents
What do you believe is a better alternative to determine how active someone is?
Don't quit, your posts have kept me interested in the new cleveland stuff. Especially since you seem to be honest about good and bad days and the fitting session, that was you right? As for anyone discounting reviews because they are written by a woman, who would care what they thought anyway. Admittedly I'm not gonna be interested in womens equip. but all the other stuff is being reviewed by a valid reviewer.
Keep up the good work.
Your posts have been fine. And I think you've done a great job with the Compression board. I have been a member since September 1, 2009, and I received my first product to review a little over a year later (The Burner 2.0 irons). I watched many other people get the opportunity to test/review products and I was always there to congratulate them and support them in their testing. I asked questions, I bumped the thread with what I thought was relevancy. That's what I mean by putting in the time. There were seasoned THP'ers here before me and I read and supported every one of their reviews. I never complained, never asked for a thing. I made friends, we talked about golf, and equipment, we got to know one another. We had the 12 Days of Holiday Cheer contest that year, and I knew every single person that won except for one, and that person never came back and shared pictures of their win. We got close. I always knew that THP was going to grow, and JB and GG will tell you that I'm one of the biggest supporters and advocates for that growth. Newer members have had opportunities to test things, some of my friends from almost two years ago are now staffers. You don't think it sucked for me not being able to apply for a staffer position? I couldn't, b/c I'm left handed. I think that sucks, but I have always been there for them, I've read every review and I've commented on probably all of them. That's putting your time in, in my opinion. It's not about what one does for themselves, but how they support their friends, their fellow testers, that's what I do. And you will be hard pressed to find anyone who does it as well as I do.
No $$$ for donating = No $$$ for golfing = Not a good candidate to be a tester. So let's all drop the whole I can't afford to donate to the site but I want to still be eligible for testing.
Testing SHOULD be a perk to get more people to donate to the site and to help support this community. It is not a right one has because they post 100 times a week. Hey people, if your posting 100 times a week then don't you think you should help support the site so it continues to stick around??
I am still new and am enjoying my "free trial" period that I know will soon end. All signs point to me sticking around and giving up some of my kids college fund to support what is going on in here (JK, maybe a round or 2 of golf fees....). But let's get off the high horse of what this site needs to be doing for YOU in terms of testing and turn our attention on what this site is doing right for everyone else as a group.
Productive posting...but that is nearly impossible to keep track of.
I don't know if we can exclude post count, but their are other factors. Tenure, ability, and quality of posts are essential. Although I am sure you guys are already looking for all of these.
I am just saying that post counts as a sole contributing factor is not a great idea. I think quality of posts is more important. I have entered into two of the club testing opportunities and have not been selected and that is 100% fine by me. I know that I don't post on as many topics as I could and if that is the reason that I have not been selected that is fine. I am sure that as an administrator and the operator of the forum you are able to make the decision on who gets to review clubs based off of the quality combined with their number of posts. I have a feeling that in your eyes pure post count is not all that you look at but many people may think otherwise. I have no problem with the way that things are being ran, I was just responding to some of the posts saying that post count should be the primary factor.
Jon
TC, maybe if it needs to be said as often as you are implying here then maybe the masses here do not really know how people are selected. Is it the companies? Is it JB and GG with the help of Ellie on occasion? Is it done with a magic 8 ball? I am tryng to be funny here but perhaps if the method were outilined somewhere then it would be understood by everyone.
20 bucks is a weeks gas money. I love THP, but there are certain things that take priority. I understand where you are coming from, but sometimes people are strapped for cash.
Can you guys (admins) pull the site's tech details of how much time a given user is logged into the site? Can you pull stats into how much "active navigating" is done by that user?
Yes, we can pull that info. However someone logging in or keeping it on in the background and changing pages every so often does little to inspire confidence in an active poster. We have never said that we needed someone with thousands of posts. However averaging 1-2 posts a day for a period of time does not seem like too much to ask for out of activity
Sure 1-2 posts a day isn't hard. But imho it's hard if the posts actually have to have some sort of value
You think so? Like I said, nobody has to post every day, but averaging a post a day does not seem like a stretch. Even thanking someone for their hardwork in testing seems pretty easy and "of value" if you ask me. But we do have to wonder that if someone does not have much to add, will they be able to add full writeups multiple times a week on equipment? How are we to know?
You think so? Like I said, nobody has to post every day, but averaging a post a day does not seem like a stretch. Even thanking someone for their hardwork in testing seems pretty easy and "of value" if you ask me. But we do have to wonder that if someone does not have much to add, will they be able to add full writeups multiple times a week on equipment? How are we to know?
That's my biggest problem. If posting isn't one's fortay (and that's fine by me) then why would they be a candidate for testing? If they can't take the time to thank or comment on other testers work, why should they expect the same? I know these aren't your thoughts JB, I'm just throwing more out there.
tapatalk: even available for lefties!
I have not gotten involved with the donation talk, because I dont think its my place, but I have to say something here. You say its your gas money and you just dont have extra money. However I would venture to say that if you got selected for a set of irons, how things might change if you were told you needed to pay $20 for shipping. I dont harp on donations, because they are just that, donations and should be up to the people, but I do see what people are saying. If its money someone does not have, then I understand completely and respect their decisions. Everybody has different economics in their life right now. However if one says that and that somehow miraculously comes up with money because they are getting free goods and need to pay for shipping, that is something different. Again, not my point of view exactly, but I understand what people are saying.
Yes, we can pull that info. However someone logging in or keeping it on in the background and changing pages every so often does little to inspire confidence in an active poster. We have never said that we needed someone with thousands of posts. However averaging 1-2 posts a day for a period of time does not seem like too much to ask for out of activity