We've launched the new forums! Read more here

THP FF Week 5 Thread

I had a longer post but stopped myself cause it's not even worth it. Somehow I doubt the veto is all in my teams best interest. Noone owes me any explanation but if you do have one, hopefully it makes sense.

I've been doing FF along time and I've made good/bad trades. When you're slumping you have to take a risk. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesnt. But I'm sitting 0-4 so obviously I'm gonna make a few moves.

Next topic... Team Grossman... 0-5 after this week. with or without Rice!
 
Whoa I just heard moss might be getting traded back to the Vikings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yoccos1981 said:
THat would be nuts! Lol. aye.
Click to expand...

That would be very good for you though. Double coverage on Moss means less coverage on the other side...Harvin. I will kick myself if this happens. I dont see it happening though.
 
A Wes Welker like roll :) Even when Rice comes back.. You're gonna keep Harvin in that spot. THat'd be nice.
JB said:
That would be very good for you though. Double coverage on Moss means less coverage on the other side...Harvin. I will kick myself if this happens. I dont see it happening though.
Click to expand...
 
Yoccos1981 said:
A Wes Welker like roll :) Even when Rice comes back.. You're gonna keep Harvin in that spot. THat'd be nice.
Click to expand...

I know I am in the minority, but I dont think Rice coming back is the answer that he is back to #1. Or even 2. Players take time to acclimate. Just my thoughts. I think he has a huge year. Hence the reason we drafted him as early as we did.
 
Wow, JL & Bridges make a big trade. Hmmmm. Not sure how I feel about this one. I think it shifts the power. HAHAHAH!
 
Good point. A hip injury is no joke to wr's. It could be interesting..
JB said:
I know I am in the minority, but I dont think Rice coming back is the answer that he is back to #1. Or even 2. Players take time to acclimate. Just my thoughts. I think he has a huge year. Hence the reason we drafted him as early as we did.
Click to expand...
 
JB said:
Wow, JL & Bridges make a big trade. Hmmmm. Not sure how I feel about this one. I think it shifts the power. HAHAHAH!
Click to expand...
Risky, risky. I only pulled the trigger because of the possibility of Moss going to Minnesota...
And because I hate Mike Shanahan.
 
Bridges said:
I was waiting for this lol
Click to expand...

Im looking at it and it seems it makes one team good, but another team pretty bad. The veto is calling me....hahahhaha
 
JB said:
Im looking at it and it seems it makes one team good, but another team pretty bad. The veto is calling me....hahahhaha
Click to expand...

Isn't that the way it was before?
 
JB said:
Im looking at it and it seems it makes one team good, but another team pretty bad. The veto is calling me....hahahhaha
Click to expand...

lol if anyone vetos it then they deserve a kick in the balls, im 0-4 dont veto my trades ha
 
_JL_ said:
Isn't that the way it was before?
Click to expand...

Yeah, but under those conditions, shouldnt one be bringing out the veto? I mean if its lopsided in teh end and all? I mean if a bad team(0-4) trades a superstar for depth and a good team(3-1) gets superstar and gives up depth, shouldnt that be vetoed? HAHAHAHAHHA
 
JB said:
Yeah, but under those conditions, shouldnt one be bringing out the veto? I mean if its lopsided in teh end and all? I mean if a bad team(0-4) trades a superstar for depth and a good team(3-1) gets superstar and gives up depth, shouldnt that be vetoed? HAHAHAHAHHA
Click to expand...
HAHA well if that's your opinion, go ahead and veto it! I'll understand! :)
 
I may VETO. Cause one team appears to be getting worse.

Also, my team is GOOD. My record is bad. Big difference. Lol.
JB said:
Yeah, but under those conditions, shouldnt one be bringing out the veto? I mean if its lopsided in teh end and all? I mean if a bad team(0-4) trades a superstar for depth and a good team(3-1) gets superstar and gives up depth, shouldnt that be vetoed? HAHAHAHAHHA
Click to expand...
 
_JL_ said:
HAHA well if that's your opinion, go ahead and veto it! I'll understand! :)
Click to expand...

Obviously you see the logic correct? hehe
 
White Rhino said:
As commissioner JB why not just remove the veto option from the league settings?
Click to expand...

Because clearly its important to some since it has been used by multiple people in every trade that has transpired in the league so far.
 
White Rhino said:
As commissioner JB why not just remove the veto option from the league settings?
Click to expand...

Because if Im sitting at 4-10 at the end of the season and try to help a playoff team by dumping Wayne off then you need the veto button lol


And oh, OEM. YOUR GOING DOWN! haha
 
Yoccos1981 said:
I may VETO. Cause one team appears to be getting worse.

Also, my team is GOOD. My record is bad. Big difference. Lol.
Click to expand...

hahahaha

Its going to be a good week of football. I can already see the predictions. See, I knew those trades were one-sided. I cant wait to see how Week 5 plays out!
 
JB said:
Obviously you see the logic correct? hehe
Click to expand...
Yeah, same type of thing, much less dramatic IMO.
I still see Ray Rice as a top 4 ppr player.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top