- Admin
- #326
To me a review is a review is a review as far as equipment is concerned.
I would agree and I think a review should be based on what the reviewer has to offer not based on their gender. I am just going based on company feedback.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
To me a review is a review is a review as far as equipment is concerned.
Favorites for testing, that is the implication when the question of "who do you want to see reviews from?" was put out there.I don't know how testers are chosen. I've been a member since September 2009, have more than 4000 posts, and I've never been chosen to test equipment. There are no favorites.
Since the vast majority of golfers are mid to high-handicappers that's who would probably give the "best" reviews, if you catch my meaning.I think THP is pretty good about spreading the love around to all hcp'ers, that's clear with the current staff of testers. I wouldn't worry about that too much.
To me a review is a review is a review as far as equipment is concerned.
Not necessarily all scratch golfers, but there will be less on staff who are 25+ HC to demo the equipment best for beginners and play the equipment like a beginner.
I don't know how testers are chosen. I've been a member since September 2009, have more than 4000 posts, and I've never been chosen to test equipment. There are no favorites.
I think THP is pretty good about spreading the love around to all hcp'ers, that's clear with the current staff of testers. I wouldn't worry about that too much.
Since the vast majority of golfers are mid to high-handicappers that's who would probably give the "best" reviews, if you catch my meaning.
oh, well then I will say something that has really bothered me. So, before the Morgan Cup, I had posted that I was nervous for the day of and getting in. Well, I recieved a PM pretty much stating that I should have no reason to be nervous having TC as a brother. He will be able to get me in and get me ALL the answers. Well, that was wrong and quite frankly pissed me off! Then they tried to turn it around as a joke and it obviously was not. I have not told anyone about this but needed to get it off my chest as I was pissed. I had to do exactly as everyone else did to get into the Morgan Cup. And FWIW, I have no advantage over anyone else to get anything just because he is my brother, I happen to think I spend a lot of time on here, I never complain, and I always try to do whats best for THP. So, if anyone wants to sound off on TC being my bro then please do so!
Love, Overton
I agree. Sometimes the person doesn't know what they need to hear. Do you know what I mean? Not out of stupidity, but because they are uninformed. Hopefully forums like this can educate them so when it comes time to make a purchasing decision they can make an informed one.It depends on the person, their activity level, their understanding of equipment and more. Its not just about a skill set, but an understanding of what people want to read and hear as well as what is important info.
awesome, I got negative rep for this comment that all PM's should remain private. I didnt throw any names out there and they didnt sign their negative rep but I have an idea who it was. Look, if I could have given negative rep for that PM than I would have. it was very uncalled for and left a sour taste in my mouth. so yes, all PM's should remain private, but when I get accused or my family members get accused of stuff then I dont take that well. Thanks for the negative rep, I needed a little red in there.
awesome, I got negative rep for this comment that all PM's should remain private. I didnt throw any names out there and they didnt sign their negative rep but I have an idea who it was. Look, if I could have given negative rep for that PM than I would have. it was very uncalled for and left a sour taste in my mouth. so yes, all PM's should remain private, but when I get accused or my family members get accused of stuff then I dont take that well. Thanks for the negative rep, I needed a little red in there.
Lets remember to keep rep off the board. If you have an issue with it, contact GG or myself. Thanks.
To be 100% honest when I first signed up for this forum, it was definitely for the contests. The 19 days of Christmas if I recall properly. And when I was waiting for the announcement of winners I began poking around and found more and more extremely useful information to the point where I forgot I signed up originally for a contest. The testing forum to me is completely different. I didn't feel I won or subsequently lost anything nor did I hold any ill will for not being picked. Because its not a contest. As some people have mentioned it is definitely an obligation at that point unto which I was actually stressed out writing my first post on Polara golf balls! Silly I know but I wanted to be sure I provided my opinion in a coherent matter thinking others might make actually make a decision (yay or nay) based on my opinion.
Regardless, THP Testing Threads are almost the "Consumer Reports" of Golf in my opinion. You get truly unbiased commentary from the everyday golf to scratch. Whats could be better than that? I don't want to hear ONLY from a scratch golfer about a piece of equipment because thats not how I play. I also don't want to hear only from the average joe because he might not know how the product actually makes you better or worse.
So for what its worth I think the system is nearly perfect AS IS. The only thing I would understand that could/should change is to charge testers for shipping. That also seems to be a consensus. As someone else stated, winners of contests often pay for shipping AND tax on prizes.
I know myself I don't like to hear whining or complaining when not picked but seriously those users shouldn't be on this forum in my opinion.
Although its not a poll/vote but I would cast mine in the ballot of leaving it how it is with the addendum of charging for shipping.
Many thanks to THP. Where else would you be able to express your opinion in such a forum and not be flamed for toting or not toting the company line?
Thanks for being honest spaceman it's a great to see that our message we give out actually hits newer members and delivers. It's awesome to see you realized THP is more than just contests and there are great people here.
It's better you admitted to being here for the contests than most people do and just deny.
Wow, when I started looking at this thread there were 16 pages. Now it's up to 18 pages long. I am replying in the middle of page 4.
Here's my thoughts.
JB, leave the testing as you have been doing it. A VIP program I don't think will work, as it could alienate those who aren't VIP's as was mentioned earlier. And what exactly would a VIP be? Requiring donations could work, but then you would have the people who say, "I donated, why wasn't I picked?" Requiring people to send the product back could help some, but you know there would be people who wouldn't send the product back.
Someone suggested making a minimum 100 or 250 post count requirement for testing. We saw what happened with the Morgan Cup qualifying. Better than a post count only requirement, I'd suggest a tenure requirement with a post count requirement as well. Nothing crazy, but to see so many people's first post be "I'd love to test these out" gets to you after a while. A few months, maybe six months, with some kind of post requirement as well, such as 100 posts a month for however long you want to set the minimum tenure to be able to test to be. That would be 3 or 4 posts a day. I don't know how "active" that would actually be, but you don't want to tell people they have to make 10 posts a day either. If people want to be a true tester for THP, they can at least participate a little bit and not just show up at testing time. And how hard is it to make 3 or 4 posts a day? And if the tenure was three months but you've been here for six months, then it would be less than 2 posts a day. I don't think that's asking anyone to be too active.
If you make the minimum length 3 months, that's 300 posts. We have over 200 people with over 300 posts right now. Maybe 100 posts a month is too many (I don't think so!). Make it 50 posts a month. We have over 300 members with 150 posts right now. Either of those is a pretty deep testing pool. What I am NOT saying is to require 100 posts a month every month. I'm just saying if the minimum tenure is three months and 300 posts, then anyone who has been here longer than 3 months and has more than 300 posts, qualifies for testing. Even if you've been here 2 years and only have 301 posts. But if the key word is active, maybe you could add "with a minimum of 50 posts in the last 30 days" so someone who got a bunch of posts early and disappeared for a year or so couldn't just come in and be a tester.
The above was originally going to just be an idea, but after typing it all out, I like this idea a lot. I personally like the 6 month tenure with 600 posts before you would be allowed to test. Three months would possibly work too, but I still like the 100 posts per month reuirement (again just for the time it takes to get tenure). It may have already been brought up, but like I said, I am only on page 4.
Sure, I played bogey plus yesterday. I'd be a terrible choice to test a set of blades. That is where your prerequisites come in. I'd like to think I would be considered as a GI or SGI tester though.It depends on the person, their activity level, their understanding of equipment and more. Its not just about a skill set, but an understanding of what people want to read and hear as well as what is important info.
It's just my opinion, but active to me is 10 posts a week I guess. That's 40/mo. and 520/year. To me that shows you're here routinely which is and should be a requirement.
awesome, I got negative rep for this comment that all PM's should remain private. I didnt throw any names out there and they didnt sign their negative rep but I have an idea who it was. Look, if I could have given negative rep for that PM than I would have. it was very uncalled for and left a sour taste in my mouth. so yes, all PM's should remain private, but when I get accused or my family members get accused of stuff then I dont take that well. Thanks for the negative rep, I needed a little red in there.
just my opinion but that's barely more than 1/day. I don't think that's overly active at all
Agreed but it all depends on someones life style. Look at me for instance, I am done school everyday at around 11:00 and usually bang out close to 100 posts a day. That's just my style though because I am not busy at all. It's understandable for someone with a full time schedule to not post much. I hope I can be as active as I am now when I start work.