Fairway2Green
The Obstacle is the Path
[/IMG]
[/IMG]
Wanted to show us those clubs real bad huh? Hahaha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
[/IMG]
[/IMG]
Wanted to show us those clubs real bad huh? Hahaha
HAHA. I was cleaning my clubs on Saturday morning when the balls came in the mail. They were out and clean so I took a few pics with them.
Very nice double pos--I mean review TC. I know what you mean. Heck, I found a way to hit them the same as my normal drive, but then I noticed I was still losing out like crazy compared to a a normal ball hit the same way. It just ain't worth it.
I'm not knocking these balls in any way- I have the same moral qualms about using SGI clubs but I use them. Therefore, I will approach this test with an open mind....
Okay, I have to ask despite this being the Polara thread. You have a moral dilemma with Super Game Improvement irons? You do realize they are legal to use right? Do you have a moral dilemma with hybrids? Technically, in many cases, a SGI is nothing more than a hybrid further up the irons. A 5 or 6 hybrid is a SGI is it not?
Easiest thing I can think of to campare to is driving a car with one of those "autosticks". Sure, I could get really good at shifting at the right time, but once I decide to move up to the next level- a car with a clutch, I'd be stalling it like crazy.
First off, I admit I was a little disappointed to hear these balls were not only from a brand I've never heard of, but that they were non-conforming. As a beginner golfer with less than two years experience, I'm still looking for the "right way" to do things. Sure, nonconforming equipment might give a bit of an edge in the short term, but it could hurt in the long run if I ever evolve as a golfer to use better, more "pro" equipment. I'm not knocking these balls in any way- I have the same moral qualms about using SGI clubs but I use them. Therefore, I will approach this test with an open mind....
PART ONE- DELIVERY/UNBOXING
Received these balls this afternoon in the mail. Two sleeves of the 2-piece, two sleeves of the 3-piece, and the instructions. Never had balls that came with an instruction manual before. I do like the sleeves' packaging, remind me of Nike Power Distance balls. Opening the packaging, I notice I got all 3s and 4s, my favorite numbers (don't ask me why). Both balls' covers have a hard feel to them, and a finish somewhat duller than usual. Compression was fair, squeezing them in between my hands barely compressed either one, but the 2-piece was a little bit softer.
Since I'll be using these balls on a simulator, I'll test the short game here at home in the living room.
Putting with these balls was average- no better, no worse than usual. From the end of my living room to the end of the hallway is about 19 feet. From this distance I usually sink about 1 in 5 putts on carpet. Hit each sleeve twice- 6 balls of the 2-piece, 6 with the 3-piece and sank 3 putts total, and the ones that didn't go in all landing within 4 feet of my practice cup.
Chipping is where the difference between the 2 balls became more apparent. Using a light chip swing with a 52* gap wedge, I hit 6 shots with 3 different balls, two of the 2-piece, 2 of the 3-piece, and 2 with the Z-Stars I normally play. The 3-piece balls stopped much better- similar to the Z-Stars, with the 2-piece balls rolling out more. The picture tells the story here...
PART TWO- SIMULATOR TEST
Finally made it out this afternoon to the Golf Dome, an indoor driving range with 2 simulators. Opened up each sleeve of #4s and started off light like I normally do at an "open" driving range. Started off with a few wedge shots, then every other club until driver (LW, GW, 9i, 7i, 5h, 3h, 3w, then driver). With the irons, I didn't use the alignment stamp at all, just dropped and hit, similar to if I were playing these on a course and would have to play them as they lie. Not one of my better days with control, but they did all stay within a 45-degree radius of each other with the exception of a few 'hosel rockets' which technology still hasn't found a way to correct (maybe a built-in parachute that pops out to prevent them from getting too far gone?). Distances were about average with a few minor miscalculations from the simulator (there is NO WAY IN HELL I hit a 9i for 154 yds!). Hitting the hybrids and 3w I used the stubby tee and the alignment stamp. This is where the ball, while it did hit straighter, didn't hit as far- especially with the 3w. Normal distance with the 3w for me is about 175-190 yds., and I was only seeing 178 on my best shot. Driver was a massive fail- my averages are between 185-210, and I was ranging between 166-192. Again though, they did as they advertise to do- they did stay straighter than normal. A few went right down the middle of the "fairway", and the ones that went left all stayed within a 45-degree range.
Would I buy these balls? Probably not. Biggest reason wasn't the loss of distance or lack of feel, though. The main reason is the fact that they're nonconforming. Could I use something that helps me hit straighter? Absolutely. But I'd prefer something a little more legal. Second reason is the price. With an MSRP of $39.99 per dozen for the 3-piece, I don't think asking for a ball with a more durable urethane cover is asking too much.
While I appreciate the efforts of THP and Polara Golf for letting me try these, I don't think these will find their way into my bag anytime soon.
Easiest thing I can think of to campare to is driving a car with one of those "autosticks". Sure, I could get really good at shifting at the right time, but once I decide to move up to the next level- a car with a clutch, I'd be stalling it like crazy.
Id compare it to a hammer. Some have bigger hitting spots, some have smaller. Rookies find it easier with the big hammer, Pros find the smaller head better for speed and lightweight use. We all have different needs, but the ball needs to go in the same hole.
Id compare it to a hammer. Some have bigger hitting spots, some have smaller. Rookies find it easier with the big hammer, Pros find the smaller head better for speed and lightweight use. We all have different needs, but the ball needs to go in the same hole.
Just a quick update. I played a round with one of my sons friends yesterday that slices the crud out of the ball. We are talking 60 yard slices with his driver no problem. I gave him on of the Polara's to hit. Right down the middle. He could not believe it. It was amazing. I did not think that the ball could hold up to his swing but it did. AMAZING>
Just a quick update. I played a round with one of my sons friends yesterday that slices the crud out of the ball. We are talking 60 yard slices with his driver no problem. I gave him on of the Polara's to hit. Right down the middle. He could not believe it. It was amazing. I did not think that the ball could hold up to his swing but it did. AMAZING>
I got a really good practice round in yesterday - took all 12 balls out on the tee box of one hole - and put them up against 2 sleeves of e-6. I hit my first tee shot that i was playing on the hole, then i hit 1 sleeve of each - and marked off the avergae distances, patterns. Im going to put a thorough review in later - but im focused on somethine else until 2 pm. My in depth analysis should be up tonight.
nice testing, I hit mine against the e6 on Saturday. Can't wait to see your results on that one.