fen_boy
Not a clown.
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 3
- Handicap
- Fore right
no way will I ever go near placing a wager ON Mrs. Doubtfire. The guy is the king of....well you know.
moobs?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
no way will I ever go near placing a wager ON Mrs. Doubtfire. The guy is the king of....well you know.
That was pretty funny; thanks for the laugh.
In all seriousness, I think the american psyche is an advantage in match play that the europeans just cannot replicate. The american psyche is filled with fortitude, verve and an increased value placed on "winners."
The european psyche has value as well (and perhaps you are the better person to speak of it), but I think that it just doesn't provide the additional boost in a person's drive in a manner that the american psyche does.
Although I will say that Mooby, sorry Monty, is one determined competitor in team games, and I don't think there's anyone on the US team can match his girth at the RC.
I agree with this. I can't speak for the whole European attitude, but in the UK in particular, we seem to be a little embarrassed by wanting to succeed. As if it's not the done thing to dream and aspire to something you might not reach, and we're too reserved as a whole.
Although I will say that Mooby, sorry Monty, is one determined competitor in team games, and I don't think there's anyone on the US team can match his presence at the RC.
I agree with this. I can't speak for the whole European attitude, but in the UK in particular, we seem to be a little embarrassed by wanting to succeed. As if it's not the done thing to dream and aspire to something you might not reach, and we're too reserved as a whole.
Although I will say that Mooby, sorry Monty, is one determined competitor in team games, and I don't think there's anyone on the US team can match his presence at the RC.
Sorry JB, got it now. But I guess the question is, what will happen when it comes down to it? Will the little homeless guy be eaten by the Pringle monster?
The bigger question is will the little guy be eaten by him.
I agree with this. I can't speak for the whole European attitude, but in the UK in particular, we seem to be a little embarrassed by wanting to succeed. As if it's not the done thing to dream and aspire to something you might not reach, and we're too reserved as a whole.
Although I will say that Mooby, sorry Monty, is one determined competitor in team games, and I don't think there's anyone on the US team can match his presence at the RC.
That is interesting. I read an article about a month ago that pretty much stated exactly what you said. The article was about the UK and certain commonwealth realms, such as Australia, that have imported some American lingo. The fear, in the author's eyes, was that the US culture may be adopted along with the linguistics. In particluar, the author was concerned that admiration for a good loser and deploring a poor winner would be lost. The author noted that their sport's champions didn't use to pump their fists in the air and ever throw tantrums or their racquets or clubs. And that their sports heroes weren't derided and hounded when they didn't win.
I think most reasonable human beings would be able to respect a good loser over a poor winner, or is it really different in the US?
If that was the case, I'd definitely not want to see that creep in - but I don't believe that for a second. I wouldn't mind some of the US culture being adopted. In particular, the belief that you can be anything you want, and you can acheive anything you set your mind to. I always remember kids at my school being told to tone down their aspirations, and aim for something more 'realistic'. A bit sad.
It just seems that here, sometimes, we respect a good loser over any type of winner. As if it's boorish and brash to admit that you really want to win. It's not the done thing to aspire. Sometimes it's helpful to put a bit of pressure on the perennial loser, instead of putting the arm round them and saying it's all ok, maybe next time.
I really dislike a bad winner, but even in the US team - bad winners are few and far between.
Why do something if you are not going to put your best effort into it?
It's not that at all. It's not admitting that you're trying your heart out to win. In case you come in 2nd.
I understand. I can understand that, but I don't agree with it. I have always been taught that the only failure is to not try your hardest. I guess both the US and UK have a strong desire to win, it is just that the state of mind in dealing with losing is very different.
Can't say I totally agree with it either. Somewhere in the middle of both would be ideal, but it takes a lot to shift ideologies at that level.
In saying all this, I'm not sure this psychology applies to the Euro team. Certainly, it applies to the general public and media perception, but these guys have been playing for long enough and striving to win that both teams must be full of self belief.
The main time I think this point of view can hold the US back is in situations like the Ryder Cup. When team sometimes needs to be valued more than individual success. Sure, the US has some great performances in team sports, but when these guys are used to teeing it up for themselves every week with the same attitude, it might be a little harder to make the switch from being 'the man' to being 'the team player'.
You make a great point about playing as a team. I think it might be a bit hard to switch.
paulo, i was watching the golf channel last night and it looks like monty's gonna have a tough decision. who to leave out, out of these four:
paddy
donald
rose
casey
I look at Paddy's game right now, much the same way I look at Tigers. Paddy would get picked based on his years past, not what he has done anytime recently.