Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Put blinders on and you'll limit yourself and probably end up less happy.
I'm not a Callaway fan. I tried the golf balls and some of their equipment. It wasn't a fit. Callaway really doesn't interest me, it's just a preference.
I suppose if I believed in an "Evil Empire" for golf it would have to be all the golf club, and ball manufacturers in general. Think about it. With all the technology advancements in golf clubs, and balls, none of the manufacturers have got it right yet. In other words their marketing techniques, and values. How come no manufacturer has come up with the ultimate club, and/or ball that guarantees distance, and accuracy? Even though in a round about way they say they can, in reality they can't. Why can't they? Because there are tens of millions of different golfers out there, swinging the clubs which hits the balls tens of millions different ways. ..
I suppose if I believed in an "Evil Empire" for golf it would have to be all the golf club, and ball manufacturers in general. Think about it. With all the technology advancements in golf clubs, and balls, none of the manufacturers have got it right yet. In other words their marketing techniques, and values. How come no manufacturer has come up with the ultimate club, and/or ball that guarantees distance, and accuracy? Even though in a round about way they say they can, in reality they can't. Why can't they? Because there are tens of millions of different golfers out there, swinging the clubs which hits the balls tens of millions different ways. ..
CT,
You are right about the public perception. Ironically TM has both the number one selling iron and the number one selling driver right now.
Your point brings up something else as well. Many get mad at companies like Mizuno, TM, Adams, etc... for bringing so many sets of irons and so many drivers out each year. While money is behind it all, I think there is more to it than that. I think part of it is that they are really trying to go after the "we have clubs for every single kind of player" mentality.
Not me, I like choices. Not every club out there fits my swing. I am a bit of an equipment junkie anyway, so I like having all these options. I believe I have been able to improve my game with equipment over the 10 years I have played. I have also made some terrible mistakes, like the Burner Draw that I renamed the Burner Snap Hook, and the Fat Shaft irons. Sometimes you gotta kiss some frogs to find a princess.
CT,
You are right about the public perception. Ironically TM has both the number one selling iron and the number one selling driver right now.
Your point brings up something else as well. Many get mad at companies like Mizuno, TM, Adams, etc... for bringing so many sets of irons and so many drivers out each year. While money is behind it all, I think there is more to it than that. I think part of it is that they are really trying to go after the "we have clubs for every single kind of player" mentality.
So people get mad at the companies for trying to please everyone and for not pleasing everyone. I find it interesting that the golf equipment companies are labeled the "Evil Empire", yet people don't have such strong feelings about the drug companies when their prescription medications don't work. What is it about golf that elicits such strong emotions?
I've heard arguments in favor of "Evil Empire" status for every single one of the major golf companies:
Acushnet/Titleist: They play a bazillion players to tee up their ball so it will be the "#1 ball in golf" even though there are better balls. They pay certain sites to guarantee good reviews/Their ad money with the golf magazines guarantees good rankings. Their affiliation with Scotty Cameron: he artificially inflates prices for putters and accesories by creating a limited market, and his putters aren't even that good. Plus, he stole all his putter designs from other designers like Karsten Solheim (PING) and T.P. Mills.You can make an argument for/against any company. Every company has some good and some bad points. That's why I don't pay attention to anything except: How well do I hit this club. If I limited myself based on perception or past clubs I've hit, I never would have tried the TM R9's, which I love, because previously I'd never cared for any TM irons I'd demo'd.
TaylorMade: They pay a bazillion players to use their clubs, and drivers specifically. They release too many clubs too quickly, which means as soon as you buy something, the value drops; and merchants lose money because of this.
PING: Their MAP policy makes their clubs more expensive than they should be. They unfairly cut off retailers who violate their MAP policy, even if it was only one time and even if it was an accident. They don't make any forged clubs, so their irons have no feel and they try to claim that cast is as good as forged. Plus, their clubs are ugly.
Nike: They bought their way into golf with Tiger Woods. Their equipment is inferior and the only reason people buy it/use it is because they are a marketing machine.
Callaway: Only makes game improvement clubs. They don't have any real player's clubs. They stole Phil Mickelson from Titleist. They are overpriced. They are just out to make a buck; look at all the garbage accessories they sell.
Golf club companies are like life. Keep an open mind and you'll be a lot more likely to find something you like and that works for you. Put blinders on and you'll limit yourself and probably end up less happy.
So people get mad at the companies for trying to please everyone and for not pleasing everyone. I find it interesting that the golf equipment companies are labeled the "Evil Empire", yet people don't have such strong feelings about the drug companies when their prescription medications don't work. What is it about golf that elicits such strong emotions?
Minimum Advertised Price.thanks1974 said:Great post Harry but I'm going to plead ignorance on one thing.....what is MAP policy?
Minimum Advertised Price.
Companies set a minimum price forwhich a product can be sold. The arguments are that it protects smaller shops from being undercut by mega stores and Internet retailers, and puts a premium on service and fitting. PING has been very agressive at enforcing their MAP policy. But the retailers who always make news when they get their account closed are the smaller stores, like the store that was giving discounts to military personelle. Of course, what fails to get mentioned is the PING must enforce all violations or the policy can be attacked as discriminatory and price setting.
If Mr. Dealer was smarter he would have included a free non ping putter, shoes or anything else with percieved value instead of lowering his price on the irons set.
Does Callaway have a MAP policy, or is the manager at Golf HQ just FOS?
Drove past the store about a month ago and their electronic sign was advertising Big Bertha Diablo balls 2 for $30. I couldn't pass that deal up so I went into the store, and when I found the balls there was a sign that they were 2 for $39.99. I explained to the manager about the sign and he refused to sell them to me at 2 for $30. I had explained to him that since that price was advertised, even in error, he was obligated to sell at that price, and he still refused, claiming "Callaway won't allow it". I took a picture of the inside sign intending to file a complaint with the BBB, and before I could get a picture of the outside sign, he RAN into the office in the back and turned off the sign.