Golf Chick
Golf Fashionista
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 8,224
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Southern California
- Handicap
- Decreasing
Woah, what happened to the Steelers last night!??!? Ben must still be injured...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think the Chargers could easily come out flat against Dallas. They may not but the way it sets up for them this is somewhat of a trap game for them.
Let's hope they don't get all rested up before a week from Sunday.
Kevin
I think the Chargers could easily come out flat against Dallas. They may not but the way it sets up for them this is somewhat of a trap game for them.
Woah, what happened to the Steelers last night!??!? Ben must still be injured...
Not sure if anyone else is watching the Packers v Bears game, but there was a ruling of an incomplete pass in the end zone that I'm just having a hard time wrapping my head around the ruling. It was challenged and up held, but I still disagree.
Greg Jennings made the catch, had two feet down with control, as his third step hit the ground the ball was stripped, during a tackle, and went out the back of the end zone. If this happened outside of the end zone, I would have to think it would have been ruled a fumble. And when a running back dives into the end zone and lose control of the ball, but broke the plane, it is ruled a TD. So I don't understand how this is ruled an incomplete pass, and not a TD after control with two feet down was established. Brian Billick is one of the announcers, and he thought it should have been ruled a TD.
Can someone explain to me why there are different penalties for encroachment, offsides, and unabated to the QB?
Encroachment is called when a defensive player comes across the line and makes contact with an offensive player before ball is snapped.
Offsides is breaking the line before the ball is snapped.
No, I know what each is. I just don't understand why there are 3 categories for what are really just minor variations on offsides. I mean, there are several different ways to commit defensive pass interference, but they don't have different penalties for each variation. It's just pass interference.
The reason they make the variation is because one of the two causes a play to be blown dead and the other does not and is essentially a free play.
Hmmm, well then, there's another good question: Why?
They all occur before the play (officially) starts, so why not blow them all dead and assess the penalty?
THe reason why as I understand it is safety. Offsides offers an advantage as does lining up in the neutral zone, where is encroachment if they let the play play out, could result in someone getting killed because of the hit.
Was that pathetic or what? It almost looked like the Steelers threw in the towel last night. The entire Steelers O looked liked they were completely unprepared for this game.
The Giants found out tonight why the Packers never put Aaron Rouse in coverage if they could help it.
Kevin
LOLOL...great point. Yesterday was the perfect outcome for the Pack. If the Eagles can win that division, and the Giants and Cowboys are our wildcard opposition, we are sitting pretty. We match up very well on the tiebreakers. However, we do want that 5 seed so we could go to Philly (the way it looks now) instead of Arizona.
Not sure if anyone else is watching the Packers v Bears game, but there was a ruling of an incomplete pass in the end zone that I'm just having a hard time wrapping my head around the ruling. It was challenged and up held, but I still disagree.
Greg Jennings made the catch, had two feet down with control, as his third step hit the ground the ball was stripped, during a tackle, and went out the back of the end zone. If this happened outside of the end zone, I would have to think it would have been ruled a fumble. And when a running back dives into the end zone and lose control of the ball, but broke the plane, it is ruled a TD. So I don't understand how this is ruled an incomplete pass, and not a TD after control with two feet down was established. Brian Billick is one of the announcers, and he thought it should have been ruled a TD.
Surely you don't think that it makes a particle of difference where the Packers go in the first round? If they win, eventually they will have to go to either Minnesota or New Orleans, and then they're toast. They have already lost twice to Minnesota, and I'm pretty sure that the Saints are playing better than the Vikings.
Surely you don't think that it makes a particle of difference where the Packers go in the first round? If they win, eventually they will have to go to either Minnesota or New Orleans, and then they're toast. They have already lost twice to Minnesota, and I'm pretty sure that the Saints are playing better than the Vikings.
I'm looking at the same sort of scenario for the Broncos... no matter if they finish at the top of the wild card race. Eventually they will have to face a quality team and they've shown that they they just don't quite stack up.