grab6303
New member
430, I likey, 460, not so much
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bottom line to this thread is that Golf companies will NOT do it. That would only encourage people to hit up ebay and buy older clubs. What will happen is that Adams Speedline will win the driver tech war this year and aerodynamics are the next big marketing thing. If the look is bothering you check out Cobra S9 Pro D, Nickent 4DX, most of the Adams line. None of those appear to be 460.
"Wheel go 'round in a circle"
I think we'll see a few years of decreasing driver head sizes, and then another ramp up. Kind of like men's ties. Or skirt lengths. Or avocado colored cars.
Compared to a 460 the 425 heads appear tiny. I like my R7 425 quite a bit but not sure if I would want to drop down to something in the rnage of a 380 or less.
the bigger it is, the easier it is to ht.
That's what she said.
Spoilersorry.
wbhat is everyoine doing on the forum at 1:35 am.
the bigger it is, the easier it is to ht.
I am all for wanting to see smaller drivers. If you hit the ball in the center of the club it doesn't really matter how big it is. I would rather look down at a soft shell turtle than a sea turtle.
Not sure if you were joking or not, but for many people that is the furthest thing from the truth. I am still using a Titleist 983-E that is 350cc. I have no problems hitting it. I have kept it this long because I have not found anything that I can hit further, straighter, or more consistent. I have a friend who still uses a 983-K. I think the bigger drivers are harder to hit. I think a smaller head adds a little to the focus of the shot. Every time I look down at my driver I have to really focus in on what I am doing because there is very little room for error. When I hit a 460, I still focus but I know there is more room for error. That thinking leads to inconsistency in the swing.
The only thing that larger driver heads and super game-improvement irons have done is handicap the game. You get all of these hacks on the course who hit 10 good shots out of a 110 and they think they are great. Nobody want to actually swing a club better, they just want a club that will cover up the mistakes. 30 years ago you had a choice with one persimmon driver and another one that looked just like it. You had best be able to swing the club well, because the equipment wouldn't help you at all.
Different people have different views. I've seen many people who hit a small driver and have trouble, hand them a bigger one and they don't have a problem. Bigger driver = larger face = less room for error.
You mean more room for error.
But what about those who don't need any room for error? Where are the blades of the driver market?
Ok well it can go both ways right? If you have a smaller face, there is a bigger chance of not hitting the sweet spot, hitting off the toe etc.
If you have a bigger face, there is a better chance of hitting the sweet spot because it is bigger.
Ok well it can go both ways right? If you have a smaller face, there is a bigger chance of not hitting the sweet spot, hitting off the toe etc.
If you have a bigger face, there is a better chance of hitting the sweet spot because it is bigger.
I assure you a brand new 400cc driver would be a lot better than a 5 year old 400cc driver. Club head size isn't the only thing that makes these drivers nowadays so good.